

If you have ever wondered whether the advice to introduce egg and other allergenic foods early actually makes a difference, a large new study offers a clear answer. For years, carefully controlled trials around the world have shown that early introduction can prevent food allergy. What we have had less of, until now, is real-world evidence that the same effect holds across an entire population once guidelines change and families act on them.
That evidence has now arrived, and it is encouraging news for any parent weaning a baby. Here is what the study found and what it means for you.
The study was led by Dr Jennifer Koplin at the University of Queensland with colleagues in Melbourne. The researchers compared two large groups of one-year-old infants in Melbourne, recruited using identical methods at their 12-month immunisation visits. The first group was seen between 2007 and 2011, before Australia changed its infant feeding guidance. The second was seen between 2018 and 2019, after the change. In total, more than 7,000 infants were included.
The findings were clear. The typical age at which babies were first given egg fell from eight months to six months. The proportion of babies given egg by six months of age more than doubled, rising from around a quarter to well over half. Over the same period, and after careful adjustment for other factors that affect allergy risk, egg allergy fell from 9.2% to 7.6%, a reduction of more than 17%. Taken together, these findings strongly suggest that introducing egg earlier in infancy, particularly between four and six months of age, contributed to the reduction in egg allergy observed across the population.
A reduction of this size across a whole population is a meaningful result, particularly given how simple the underlying change is. To put the scale into perspective, Professor Lack draws a comparison with a well-known success in preventive medicine.
"In cardiology, statins have reduced heart attacks and strokes by around 30%, and that has been a real triumph, but it took decades to achieve. Here, a simple dietary change, introducing egg by six months of age, has been associated with a comparable reduction in egg allergy."
This new evidence stems from Prof. Lack’s ground-breaking LEAP (Learning Early About Peanut) study in 2015. This showed that introducing peanut early reduced peanut allergy by more than 80% in the children studied. The EAT (Enquiring About Tolerance) study and trials in Japan and elsewhere went on to show a similar protective effect for egg and other foods. Together, this body of evidence overturned decades of advice that had told parents to delay allergenic foods, and it prompted countries around the world to update their infant feeding guidelines.
Australia acted quickly. Following the LEAP results, it updated its national guidance in 2016 to recommend introducing egg and other allergenic foods in the first year of life. What Dr Koplin’s new study demonstrates is that this change in policy was followed by a real change in behaviour, and that the change in behaviour was followed by a measurable fall in allergy. In other words, the chain runs all the way from a clinical trial, to a guideline, to the diets of ordinary babies, to fewer children growing up with egg allergy.
The same pattern is now emerging with early introduction of other foods. In the United States, rates of both peanut allergy and overall food allergy have also declined since infant feeding guidelines shifted towards earlier introduction of allergenic foods. In Australia, earlier peanut introduction following changes to national feeding advice was accompanied by a fall in peanut allergy. These real-world observations reinforce the message of studies such as LEAP and EAT: introducing allergenic foods at the right time can alter the trajectory of food allergy, not just for individual children, but across entire populations. This is precisely the kind of impact we hoped our research would have when we set out to challenge the old advice. Controlled trials such as LEAP and EAT can show a reduction in allergy of 80 to 90% under ideal conditions. This study shows that even when a guideline is rolled out across a whole population, with all the variation of real family life, it still produces a measurable benefit.
One of the most important details in the study concerns babies with early eczema. In this group, egg allergy fell by 37%, from 34.6% to 21.9%, a far larger drop than in the population as a whole.
This matters because babies with eczema are at the highest risk of developing food allergy in the first place. As we explain in our guidance on food allergy risk, a compromised skin barrier can allow food proteins to reach the immune system through inflamed skin rather than through the gut, which can lead to allergy. The fact that early egg introduction made the biggest difference in exactly this high-risk group is strong support for the dual allergen exposure hypothesis developed by Professor Lack.
It would be a mistake, though, to think of early introduction as something only for high-risk babies. While the protective effect is largest in infants with eczema, most food allergy across the population occurs in children without severe eczema. That is why the case for early introduction applies to all babies: advice aimed only at the highest-risk infants would miss the majority of cases. This is a population-wide opportunity, not a niche measure.
The benefits of early food introduction appears to extend beyond egg. A large US study found that after national guidelines encouraged the early introduction of allergenic foods, peanut allergy fell by 43%, accompanied by a reduction in overall food allergies by 29%. While peanut has the strongest evidence base, these real-world findings support the broader strategy of introducing a variety of allergenic foods during infancy to promote immune tolerance.
A consistent theme runs through all of the science, and it is worth stating plainly. The clear message from the research is that earlier is better, and this applies to peanut, egg, and probably most food allergens.
Australian data on peanut showed that after national guidelines changed to encourage earlier peanut introduction, peanut allergy fell from 3.1% to 2.6%. The study also found a clear trend: babies introduced to peanut from four to six months of age were better protected than those first introduced peanut later. In other words, it is not just whether peanut is introduced that matters, but when it is introduced. Introducing foods early, particularly during the first few months of weaning, appears to provide the greatest protection against allergies.

The practical steps are straightforward, and for most low-risk babies they can be taken safely at home. The key is that early introduction is a managed process, not a free-for-all: it means giving the correct amounts of the right foods, prepared in a safe form, regularly over time, and seeking professional guidance first if your baby is at higher risk. Done this way, it is both safe and effective.
The exact amount varies between foods and between studies, but the principle is the same: early introduction works best when appropriate amounts of the foods are eaten regularly and become part of normal family life, rather than being given occasionally.
Parents sometimes worry that early introduction of solids means giving up on breastfeeding. It does not. Breastfeeding is always recommended and is entirely compatible with introducing healthy solid foods early.
In the EAT study, where babies were encouraged both to breastfeed and to eat solids from around three months of age, breastfeeding rates remained high all the way through to twelve months. The two go hand in hand.
A simple practical tip is to mix small amounts of new foods, such as well-cooked egg, smooth peanut butter, fruit or vegetables, with expressed breast milk. The familiar taste and smell of breast milk can make new foods more acceptable and may help babies transition more easily as they begin weaning.
This study is a reminder that food allergy is, in many cases, preventable, and that prevention can work not only for individual families but at the level of whole populations.
If your baby has reached four to six months of age, introducing egg and peanut, on a regular, frequent basis will help protect against egg and peanut allergy.
Every child's allergy journey is different. Whether you are looking for advice on how to safely and effectively introduce allergenic foods, a prevention plan for a high-risk baby, or a diagnosis, consult your specialist team to help you find the right path forward.
For most babies, suitably prepared well-cooked egg can be introduced once weaning has begun, from around four to six months of age, and then kept in the diet regularly. If your baby has early or severe eczema, speak with a specialist before introducing peanut.
The evidence is now strong. Controlled trials showed that early introduction reduces allergy. Now a 2026 study confirms that when Australian guidelines changed and more parents gave egg early, egg allergy across the whole population fell by more than 17%.
Yes. Babies with eczema have the most to gain from early introduction, as they are at higher risk of developing food allergy. However, babies with moderate or severe eczema are also more likely to already have a food allergy. If this applies to your baby, or they are over 6 months of age and have not yet started allergenic foods, speak to your GP or an allergy specialist.
Yes. Breastfeeding and early introduction of solid foods are entirely compatible, and we recommend both.